User talk:70.16.252.23

Vandalism

Stop Valdalising pages. A picture depticting a commonly aggred upon expression of love is not preeching homosexuality, it neither favors or opposes it. It simply shows that how some people show love. And is in fact a better picture than your tiny heart. My language is in danger of becoming extinct and you are also removing important text. What is your agenda? And do not threaten me this is not comming to anyone's atttention and if it is, theres nothing wrong. But you will get your wish, this is commming to the wikipeidia community's attention now and i will do everything i can to have you blocked. If you revert the article a third time you will be in serious violation of wikipedia Three Revert Rule "3rr" and can be blocked. Can you speak inuktitut? Then please contribute in a proper manner. If not please go away. You dont have to accept homosexuals and you are free to hate them and judge them, however on wikipedia we must be neutral and if you cant open your mind to that there is really no place for you here. Please be nice and stop this. This is very harmful to such a small project. I beg you. And as a matter of fact, all research shows that people dont choose their socalled "sexual preferance" I doubt you can recall when or why you chose yours. I am in fact heterosexual and personally never chose to be, i just was. My homosexual friends and bisexual friends feel the same way. Animals like sheep the polar bear and penguins all have been observed in homosexual relationships, penguins in fact mate for life and form male-male and female-female couples with perfectly virile or fertile and availble suiter of the opposite sex walking around right by them in both the wild and in zoo. Hate is a very bad thing, i suggest you stop, it takes up many energy and make you bitter. why not love people, all of natures beautifulness!?

I have readded the conect you erased, you cannot erase other peoples comments on your talk page it is considered vandalism. Please sign up for iu.wikipedia, assume good faith and make productive edits please!Qrc2006 03:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding our dispute

Your intimidation tactics do not scare me. A picture of two women kssing on the article for kiss is appropriate, a picture of two women hugging and kissing on the article for love is also approproate. Your heart image was too small and you removed the caption. Your picture of a boy and girl kissing also removed the caption and was not motived in good faith only by your disdain for homosexuals. The articles for sex and oral sex show images (paintings, pictures, drawings) of heterosexual contact which you dont seem to care about. That is just mean. I hope you do actually contact Jimbo Wales, I am pretty sure he will take my side on this matter. And please assume good faith, I had no idea explicit images werent allowed on the main page, no one ever told me. In fact I single handedly created this version of the main page. I thought the picture of a couple kissing was innapropriate so I put in a non-grahpic picture of a sex act, a Japanese painting-art-not pornography. Furthermore it not considered good wikipedia behavior to erase people's messages on your talk page. it is not yours to erase, only your user page comes with that benefit. Furthermore you have never dialogued with me, only once have you spoken to a third party. These issues should be resolved on talk pages. Please talk back to me, either on here, my talk page, on relevant article talk pages, or on the main page talk page.Qrc2006 03:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

ᐅᒥᙵᓯᓯᔪᖅ/uminngasisijuq

ᐃᓕᔅᓯ ᐱᒋᕚ ᐱᙴᑎᑉᐹ «ᐅᒥᙵᓯᓯᔪᖅ » ᑕᒪᑐᒪᓂ ᐊᑕᐅᓯᖅ ᑕᒃᕿᒃ./ilissi pigivaa pinnguutippaa «uminngasisijuq» tamatumani atausiq takqik.[1],[2],[3],[4]"More appropriate instead of preaching a decadent lifestyle". ᐊᐃᕙᑉᐹ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐃᓗᓕᒃ ᐅᖓᒻᒧᐊᒍᑎᕚ ᐊᖑ./aivappaa amma ilulik ungammuagutivaa angu.